🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.